Burning question:
There's so much monitoring data already- camera trap archives, acoustic recordings, GPS tracks - but almost all of it was collected to answer presence/absence or population questions. What I'm after is the layer above that: behavior. Not "is the species there," but "what are they doing, and for how long."
I'm working toward behavioral time-budget analysis as an early signal of ecosystem stress, and I keep hitting the same wall: how do you actually pull structured behavioral data out of collections that were never designed to capture it?
What I'm trying to figure out:
- What's genuinely been automated here, vs. still manual annotation?
- Is anyone extracting behavior (not just detection) from camera trap or bioacoustic archives at any kind of scale?
- Are there datasets already behaviorally coded, or is everyone building that layer from scratch?
Pointers to people, papers, tools - all welcome. Curious what's worked and what's been a dead end.
Thanks!
Maggie
17 June 2026 6:53am
There’s also a step before the behavioral analysis. And that’s capturing the behavior in the first place.
I agree the behavior side is very interesting. Our thermal module based camera traps see in both day and night over great distances. They also record in both thermal and visible light continuously, allowing one to remotely retrieve a video section, wind it backwards and see what the animal was doing before and where did it come from. Thermal enabled camera traps add huge value for behavior analysis.
Kim Hendrikse