Hi All,
After hosting a wonderful session with engaging discussions at ICTC last month, we’ve been continuing to build on our work to integrate data justice into as many elements of our practice at Fauna & Flora as we can. The slides from our presentation are attached if you were unable to join!
We’re leaning heavily on the work produced by Rose Pritchard, discussed in this paper, to create six core principles, viewed through two lenses, for applying data justice. As an international conservation NGO, we recognise our responsibility to ensure that the power of data we use is shaped, led, and informed by the voices of those on the ground.
The six principles are:
- Data is collected with free, prior, and informed consent and maximises benefits to conservation and IPLCs.
- Data influence is localised, and where influenced by external sources, this is clearly documented.
- Data is accessible to those represented by it, with appropriate consideration of privacy.
- Data is representative and unbiased.
- Data processing, analysis, and visualisation are documented, with limitations noted.
- Data is used in accordance with consent and its original purpose.
These principles are viewed through the lenses of Purpose and Permission. These highlight that data must have a clearly defined purpose—never collected for its own sake—and that in every location we work, we operate within permissions granted by governments, local authorities, and IPLCs.
As we continue developing this work, we would love to collaborate further and learn how others are also incorporating data justice, fairness, and equity into their data practices.
Best,
Chelsea Smith
Senior Programme Manager, Technolgy & Nature
Making_Data_Justice_Practical_External.pdf
3 April 2026 4:17pm
Hello!
Thank you for sharing this valuable work, it's fantastic to see F&F push the general conversation into structured guidelines. Given the current focus among many IPLCs regarding data/tech sovereignty, accelerated by the increased prevalence of AI in every corner of society, I have the following comment:
To build on your second principle regarding localizing data influence, a powerful next step we are seeing in the field is the requested transition from ethical guidelines to structural data governance—specifically through Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) via cooperative frameworks. While internal principles ensure NGOs act responsibly, helping IPLCs establish their own independent systems transforms them from 'consulted participants' into the actual legal owners and decision-makers of their digital environments. A major pain point is the feeling of being "powerless", and a desire for self determination.
For example, initiatives like Abalobi and PescaData have successfully used data cooperative models to empower smallholder fishing communities, giving them agency over their data while simultaneously achieving marine conservation outcomes. Furthermore, when IPLCs collectively govern their data, they can leverage it to create sustainable, independent funding streams for their communities, reducing reliance on external NGO/Government grant cycles.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on how NGOs can move beyond securing consent towards actively helping IPLCs build and own their own data infrastructure, a vital necessity for many to approve technology within their spaces in today's rapidly changing landscape.
David A. Divas